|
II: FORMATION TODAY: SHADOWS
1. Vocation numbers - the darker side:
Vocation shrinkage in many Entities. This gives rise to anxiety among a considerable number of friars, with the risk of weakening the seriousness of our proposals; many disenchanted about the future; a resigned attitude in others; apathy in more than a few; the problem of keeping up a set number of formators; why train them if there are no candidates?
- A much reduced number of those in formation. This gives rise to discouragement in formators; the impossibility of correlating an individual to the group in formation.
- The Entities that have vocations find difficulty in discerning vocational motivation; positively relating to those in formation. The image of the master is still that of "dean of discipline".
- Even in instances where the number in formation is quite high, the result is a reduced family ambience and often a reduced sense of brotherhood; fewer possibilities for a more personalised formation; fewer possibilities of addressing "inculturation" in the life conditions of the local situation.
2. The "agents" of formation - the darker side:
- Formators:
- Shortage of trained formators. In general they are improvised. Too often they are appointed simply because they are good friars or because they are "special".
- Formators do not always have the "requisite calling" for this "ministry". There are those, therefore, that accept it as a "job" or a "duty" under obedience.
- Many formators do not enjoy the freedom needed for this "priority ministry". There are those who are overloaded with other work at the same time, work which impedes their dedication to formation (their own included).
- An insufficient responsiveness to the importance of working in a team of formators. In many cases the Provincial "Coetus formatorum" does not function properly.
- Formators changed too often, particularly in Entities with many in formation, or, on the other hand, formators that are irremovable. In the first case, it is not easy to relate to or discern vocational development. In the second, there is danger of fatigue.
- Formation Friaries:
- Many friaries, even those formally designated for formation, do not think of themselves as "Houses of Formation" and consequently do not assume their responsibilities in this area. There are many places where the local formation Coetus just does not function.
- Problems arising from the "generation gap": language, mindset, a world of "affectivity", the capacity to integrate
- The break, in life style, between the house of formation and the "normal" friary. This can be quite a danger particularly when the first assignments are made after Solemn Profession.
- Those in formation:
- Adult vocations, which require a longer time and an appropriate methodology.
- Candidates with psychological and emotional problems.
- Candidates with deficiencies both human and Christian.
- Difficulties with studies.
3. Other shadows:
- The safeguarding of due continuity, graduality and cohesion in programmes, in methods and in discernment and personal relationships, between the different stages of the formative process.
- The following three periods need special attending to: the postulancy, the postnovitiate period, and the period when "vocational shock" is a possibilityon coming out of the climate and programmes of initial formation and entering the rhythm of actual life in the "normal" community.
- A preoccupation with saving "the package" (i.e., the structures) at the expense of its content (i.e., the life).
- A shadow is cast by the existence of "charismatic originality". The logic that so often governs our life cannot sustain for very long our vocational choices. Here possibly is one of the reasons for a poor vocational perseverance experienced by some Entities.
- A "paralysing realism" is another dark spot. In this context it must be said that the "temperature" of faith is not high enough for facing reality.
- Formation, both on-going and initial, is handicapped by a fairly prevalent decline in studies.
|